Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
看预告的时候感觉就不会特别精彩，其实正片出来还好，能看下去
比最近的漂亮国片子好太多了。到处都是对资本的控诉，但也有人像詹妮弗那样热衷迎接资本的蜜糖（就是脑子不太好使那种）。资本冷酷无情的逻辑和理性最后玩死了自己，人们又回归家庭和人性的温暖。机器人只是表层，就像现在的算法，他们永远在模仿，而不知道自己在模仿什么。导演还是把机器人拟人化了，按照他们的思维是不可能希望变成人的，完全没有这种意图，变成人类也没好处，所以是无所谓的。导演只是借用机器人来表现资本的贪婪和无情而已。在电影这个夕阳产业，不退步已经是最大的进步了，还有人在那逼逼赖赖，也不看看其他片已经烂成什么样了，呵呵
还有芯片不是还在吗？为什么家里的机器人好像只是修好的？邻居的机器人好像还连修都没修？
从未想过是311题材的电影，Minami和Yuki的戏份尚可，小濑村晶的配乐一如既往的惊艳，唯一不太满意的可能就是中川了吧，连着两部都是怀念已逝之人的电影，但是在镜头和节奏的调度上好像并没有多大进步。
這一部作品是在描畫一個老奶奶不擅管理生活，而她生活的管家人工智慧機器則是把她關在室內的地方。應該是五個人輸給了五個人工智慧機器人。
很有意思的一部电影 一直到结局前都有一种莫名的恐慌，人工智能的电影里机器人的进化总是让人不安。在这部电影里，不管是几个忠心耿耿的家用机器人，还是反派（进化过头想取代人类）的yonex都有些衬托出人类真的在这个局面下无能为力
热内的创作力虽然早已今不如昔，但这部法国版黑镜还是从视听和文本风格上都把握住了近现科幻和法式喜剧的平衡点，人类对AI的过度依赖引起的BUG级反噬到AI的自我觉醒再到灾难级反噬的铺垫也有层次感，最后的反转点也有效果，虽然作为科幻很多梗都比较老，但通过喜剧类型的一通弥合就好了不少，总之算是年内高完成度的喜剧科幻了，到了年底可能会成为年度最佳？
结局确实漏洞很大。人类自己设计的AI，确总是担心安全问题，多此一举。
主题不明，多处配乐突兀到以为要往悬疑惊悚方向发展....
挺有意思的，科幻喜剧小品，稍显冗长，再短点就更好了。如果你愿意，可以不必去思考科技与人工智能对未来社会及人类的干预，轻松简单看看电影也不错
前半小时比较难熬，后面不错。整个故事挺有趣。
就涉及了蛮多人工智能话题的，不像是门外汉的臆想，做足了功课：机器的伦理，机器为人的条件。如何判断某对象拥有情感？如果展现出来的是快乐，就是快乐，而我们并不会去探究背后如何产生的（是人脑还是机器“脑”）云云，云云。不知道为什么评分那么低，集中在小空间，但窗外可以看见外面的世界，tyranny/hierarchy，很注重各种细节，制作也相当精良
我们就称之为串烧MV吧！没什么内容，情绪也不够，音乐也不太舒服，画面也只是糖水片。电影拍的还没素人vlog好看，单单是片头动画差点就被劝退。
接近某种思想实验，着眼点在于科技对人性和社会的异化。挺有意思的，科幻喜剧小品，稍显冗长，再短点就更好了。
题材的吸引力吧。
看了十分钟，删了，就这种不明所以乱七八糟的玩意，注定法国电影永远斗不过美国。
年龄大了 看这种慢悠悠的日本文艺片觉得有点看不下去了
看下来一直到结局感觉都很黑暗，比较客观的视角叙事，政府强行压制言论自由，仿佛世界都不见天日。电影的摄影很棒，场景也特别还原80年代，不过缺点也特别大，就是电影太长了，没有目的性取舍且似乎又有往商业电影的节奏靠拢，明显没有把握住。
感觉拍的有点碎，大乱炖。但很有意思，值得一看。这样的居家机器人请给我来一打
以及真的没必要加海啸强拉高度，因为喜欢大海就安排葬身大海？纯爱就请只聊纯爱！灾后重建与个体自愈这个点可以单独拍电影！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
